[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.J. Res. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. J. RES. 216
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as a punishment for a crime.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 15, 2026
Ms. Williams of Georgia (for herself, Mr. Amo, Ms. Barragan, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Bera, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Mr. Casar, Ms. Chu, Mr. Cleaver, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania, Ms. DelBene, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Deluzio, Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. Dexter, Mr. Frost, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Horsford, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. Lee of Nevada, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. McClellan, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Norton, Ms. Omar, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Peters, Ms. Pingree, Ms. Pressley, Mr. Quigley, Mrs. Ramirez, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Ms. Scanlon, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Sewell, Ms. Simon, Ms. Stansbury, Mr. Takano, Ms. Tlaib, Mrs. Trahan, Ms. Underwood, Mr. Lieu, and Ms. Wasserman Schultz) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as a punishment for a crime.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States has prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude for many, but not all, people in the United States since December 6, 1865; Whereas the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which barred slavery and involuntary servitude, included an exception that allowed for slavery and involuntary servitude to continue as punishment for a crime; Whereas this exception resulted in hundreds of thousands of Black Americans being returned to slavery after implementation of the Thirteenth Amendment; Whereas Congress finds the continued existence of slavery and involuntary servitude antithetical to the democratic values, norms, and mores of the United States and can undermine the moral credibility of our country on the global stage; Whereas our criminal justice system has the means to ensure people who have committed crimes are appropriately sentenced without resorting to slavery or involuntary servitude; Whereas Congress recognizes the value of high-quality work programs that provide useful skills and stability for people in correctional institutions, and it is not the intent of Congress to interfere with opportunities for incarcerated people to consent to work or to modify any employment protections currently available to people in correctional institutions; and Whereas Congress additionally acknowledges the importance of sentencing alternatives, and it is not the purpose of this amendment to interfere with the discretion of a court to offer community service as an alternative to incarceration: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:
``Article--
``Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude may be imposed as a punishment for a crime.''. <all>
Have questions about this legislation?
Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.
Already have an account? Sign in
Make your voice heard on this bill.
Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.
Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in
Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.
Founding Fathers
Historical Leaders
Modern Thinkers
See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in