civics.gg/H.R. 10011
H.R. 10011·FederalIn CommitteeImmigration

No PREJUDICE Act

Sponsored by Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25] (D-FL)Introduced July 30, 2026Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 10011 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 10011

To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to engage in discriminatory profiling, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 30, 2026

Ms. Wasserman Schultz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to engage in discriminatory profiling, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``No Person's Race, Ethnicity, Job, or Use of Dialect or Inflection is Cause for Enforcement Act'' or the ``No PREJUDICE Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATORY PROFILING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

(a) Limitation on Use of Federal Funds.--No officer or employee of the Department of Homeland Security, or a person acting under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security, may seize, detain, or arrest an individual, or subject an individual to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities on the basis of any of the following, or any combination thereof: (1) The actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or ethnicity of the individual. (2) The presence of that individual at a location associated with the recruitment or transportation of individuals for informal or temporary employment, including bus stops, car washes, or agricultural sites. (3) Participation by that individual in a particular hobby, leisure activity, job, or career. (4) The use of Spanish or any language other than English, or the use of English with an accent, by that individual. (b) Immigration Proceedings.-- (1) Request for hearing.--An alien who in removal proceedings under the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)) may request a hearing in the appropriate district court of the United States to determine whether the prohibition under subsection (a) was violated with respect to the alien. (2) Dismissal.--If the district judge determines that the prohibition under subsection (a) was violated with respect to the alien, the judge shall dismiss the removal proceedings against the alien. (3) Remand.--If the district judge determines that the prohibition under subsection (a) was not violated with respect to the alien, the judge shall remand the case to the immigration court for further removal proceedings. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in