[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 10500 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 10500
To amend the Natural Gas Act with respect to the judicial review of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 17, 2026
Ms. Lee of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Natural Gas Act with respect to the judicial review of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Unleashing American Pipelines Act''.
SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW.
Section 19 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717r) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(e) Judicial Review of Certain Claims.-- ``(1) Reviewable claims.-- ``(A) In general.--No court shall have jurisdiction of a claim with respect to the approval of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 except for a claim under chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, filed not later than 180 days after the date of such approval by-- ``(i) the applicant; or ``(ii) a person who has suffered, or likely and imminently will suffer, direct and irreparable economic harm from the approval. ``(B) Claims by certain non-applicants.--An association may only bring a claim on behalf of one or more of its members pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii) if each member of the association has suffered, or likely and imminently will suffer, the harm described in such subparagraph. ``(2) Standard of review.--If an applicant or other person brings a claim described in paragraph (1) with respect to the approval of the application described in such paragraph, the court shall hold unlawful and set aside any agency actions, findings, and conclusions in accordance with section 706(2) of title 5, United States Code, except that for purposes of the application of subparagraph (E) of such section, the court shall apply such subparagraph by substituting `clear and convincing evidence' for `substantial evidence'. ``(3) Exclusive jurisdiction.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any claim that an agency action related to an application described in paragraph (1) is beyond the scope of authority conferred by the Federal law under which such agency action is made.''. <all>
Have questions about this legislation?
Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.
Already have an account? Sign in
Make your voice heard on this bill.
Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.
Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in
Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.
Founding Fathers
Historical Leaders
Modern Thinkers
See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in