civics.gg/H.R. 4159
H.R. 4159·FederalIn CommitteeDefense

To require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in America, and for other purposes.

Sponsored by Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13] (D-IL)Introduced June 26, 2025Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 4159 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4159

To require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in America, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 26, 2025

Ms. Budzinski (for herself, Mr. Bost, and Mr. Golden of Maine) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in America, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO COMBAT FOOTWEAR OF MEMBERS OF ALL BRANCHES OF THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) In General.--Not later than 730 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations prohibiting any member of the armed forces from wearing optional combat boots as part of a required uniform unless the optional combat boots are entirely manufactured in the United States and entirely made of-- (1) materials grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States; and (2) components that are manufactured entirely in the United States and entirely made of materials described in paragraph (1). (b) Availability Exemption.-- (1) In general.--A Secretary concerned may make a determination described in subsection (c) of section 4862 of title 10, United States Code, with respect to optional combat boots designed for a specific use and a specific need of the Department of Defense in the same manner as an article or item under subsection (a) of such section. (2) Applicability.--If a Secretary concerned makes a determination described in paragraph (1) with respect to optional combat boots designed for a specific use and a specific need of the Department of Defense, the Secretary concerned may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) with respect to such optional combat boots designed for a specific use to the extent necessary to meet such need. (c) Medical Exemption.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to the wearing of optional combat boots by a member of the armed forces if such optional combat boots are medically necessary to meet a unique physiological need of such member of the armed forces. (d) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Armed forces; secretary concerned.--The terms ``armed forces'' and ``Secretary concerned'' have the meanings given such terms, respectively, in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code. (2) Optional combat boots.--The term ``optional combat boots'', with respect to a member of the armed forces, means combat boots not furnished to such member of the armed forces by the Secretary of Defense. (3) Required uniform.--The term ``required uniform'' means a uniform a member of the armed forces is required to wear as a member of the armed forces. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in