civics.gg/H.R. 8558
H.R. 8558·FederalIn CommitteeEconomy

To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to require each institution of higher education to certify as part of an application for a research and development award that such institution does not operate certain branch campuses, and for other purposes.

Sponsored by Rep. Stefanik, Elise M. [R-NY-21] (R-NY)Introduced April 28, 2026Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8558 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8558

To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to require each institution of higher education to certify as part of an application for a research and development award that such institution does not operate certain branch campuses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 28, 2026

Ms. Stefanik (for herself and Mr. Gottheimer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to require each institution of higher education to certify as part of an application for a research and development award that such institution does not operate certain branch campuses, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESEARCH SECURITY REQUIREMENT FOR INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

(a) In General.--Subtitle D of title VI of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act (42 U.S.C. 19231 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 10634 the following new section:

``SEC. 10634A. RESEARCH SECURITY REQUIREMENT FOR INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

``(a) In General.--Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this section, each head of a Federal research agency shall require an institution of higher education applying for a research and development award from such agency to include on an application for such an award a certification that such institution does not operate a branch campus in any of the following: ``(1) The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. ``(2) The Democratic People's Republic of Korea. ``(3) The Islamic Republic of Iran. ``(4) The People's Republic of China. ``(5) The Republic of Cuba. ``(6) The Republic of Turkey. ``(7) The Russian Federation. ``(8) The State of Qatar. ``(9) Any other country the Secretary of State determines appropriate. ``(b) Branch Campus Defined.--The term `branch campus' means a unit of an institution of higher education that is geographically separate from the main campus of such institution and satisfies the following requirements: ``(1) Is permanent in nature. ``(2) Offers courses leading to a degree, certificate, or other education credential. ``(3) Has the following: ``(A) Faculty and administration specific to such unit. ``(B) Budgetary and hiring authority.''. (b) Clerical Amendments.--Public Law 117-167 is amended in the table of contents in sections 1 and 10000 by inserting after the items relating to section 10634 the following new items:

``Sec. 10634A. Research security requirement for institutions of higher education.''. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in