civics.gg/H.R. 9067
H.R. 9067·FederalIn CommitteeTechnology

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for a gender identity content descriptor for video programming, and for other purposes.

Sponsored by Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1] (R-AL)Introduced May 29, 2026Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 9067 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9067

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for a gender identity content descriptor for video programming, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 29, 2026

Mr. Moore of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for a gender identity content descriptor for video programming, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GENDER IDENTITY CONTENT DESCRIPTOR FOR VIDEO PROGRAMMING.

Title VII of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 723. GENDER IDENTITY CONTENT DESCRIPTOR FOR VIDEO PROGRAMMING.

``(a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Commission shall-- ``(1) determine if the conditions of subsection (b) have been met; and ``(2) if the Commission determines under paragraph (1) that such conditions have not been met, promulgate regulations that-- ``(A) establish a content descriptor for video programming that depicts, discusses, or promotes gender identity, gender transition, transgender identity, or non-binary identity; and ``(B) require distributors of video programming to transmit the content descriptor described in subparagraph (A)-- ``(i) with any video programming that-- ``(I) contains the content described in such subparagraph; and ``(II) is marketed to children (such as programming that is rated TV- Y, TV-Y7, or TV-G under the TV Parental Guidelines); and ``(ii) in a manner that, to the maximum extent technically feasible, can be used with the feature described in section 303(x) (commonly known as the `V-chip') and other parental-control technologies. ``(b) Voluntary Compliance.--The conditions of this subsection are the following: ``(1) The TV Parental Guidelines have been revised so as to include a content descriptor for video programming that depicts, discusses, or promotes gender identity, gender transition, transgender identity, or non-binary identity. ``(2) The content descriptor described in paragraph (1) is being consistently transmitted with the rating under the TV Parental Guidelines for video programming that-- ``(A) contains content described in such paragraph; and ``(B) is rated TV-Y, TV-Y7, or TV-G under the TV Parental Guidelines or is otherwise marketed to children. ``(c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to ban or censor any video programming. ``(d) TV Parental Guidelines Defined.--In this section, the term `TV Parental Guidelines' means the voluntary ratings (or any successor to such ratings) for video programming maintained by the TV Parental Guidelines Monitoring Board (or any successor to such Board).''. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in