civics.gg/S. 5109
S. 5109·FederalIn CommitteeCivil Rights

Training Rural Law Enforcement Officers Act of 2026

Sponsored by Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK] (R-OK)Introduced July 23, 2026Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 5109 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 5109

To authorize the Department of Justice to provide grant funding to accredited nonprofit organizations to provide better access to needed training for law enforcement officers in rural and smaller communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 23, 2026

Mr. Lankford (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To authorize the Department of Justice to provide grant funding to accredited nonprofit organizations to provide better access to needed training for law enforcement officers in rural and smaller communities.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Training Rural Law Enforcement Officers Act of 2026''.

SEC. 2. TRAINING RURAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following: (1) There are more than 18,000 local police departments and 3,000 sheriff's offices in the United States. Of the local police departments in the United States-- (A) nearly half have fewer than 10 sworn officers; (B) 3 out of 4 have fewer than 2 dozen sworn officers; and (C) 8 out of 10 have fewer than 50 sworn officers. (2) Federal funding available through grants administered by the Department of Justice for law enforcement is frequently complex in terms of the application process and requires specific reporting mandates. (3) Smaller and rural law enforcement agencies often forego pursuing Federal funding opportunities as that pursuit creates a demand on already limited staffing, and those smaller and rural law enforcement agencies simply lack the experience and resources to navigate through the application process and to successfully adhere to the multitude of reporting requirements. (b) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Accredited nonprofit organization.--The term ``accredited nonprofit organization'' means a nonprofit organization that, as determined by the Attorney General, has-- (A) the proper experience and expertise in relevant law enforcement training; and (B) a strong track record of successfully conducting relevant law enforcement training in a particular training discipline. (2) Law enforcement training grant.--The term ``law enforcement training grant'' means a grant awarded by the Attorney General under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.) for the purpose of law enforcement training. (c) Authorization.--An accredited nonprofit organization or State government entity shall be eligible to receive any law enforcement training grant for the purpose of providing training to State and local law enforcement agencies with fewer than 50 sworn law enforcement officers at no cost to the law enforcement agency only for an eligible activity described in subsection (d). (d) Eligible Activities.--An eligible activity described in this subsection is training in 1 or more of the following: (1) De-escalation training for law enforcement officers using a certified training program or course (as defined in section 508(a) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10159(a))). (2) Officer wellness programs. (3) Leadership training. (4) Victim-centered training for law enforcement officers in handling situations of domestic violence. (5) Critical incident response and management. (6) Evidence-based law enforcement safety training for-- (A) active shooter situations; (B) the safe handling of illicit drugs and precursor chemicals; (C) rescue situations; (D) recognizing and countering ambush attacks; or (E) response to calls for service involving-- (i) persons with mental health needs; (ii) persons with substance use disorders; (iii) veterans; (iv) persons with disabilities; (v) vulnerable youth; (vi) persons who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, or trafficking; or (vii) persons experiencing homelessness or living in poverty. (7) Specialized training to law enforcement officers to enhance their conflict resolution, mediation, problem solving, service, and other skills needed to work in partnership with members of the community. (e) Amendment.--Section 501(b) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10152(b)), is amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively and shifting the margins accordingly; (2) by striking ``A State'' and inserting the following: ``(1) In general.--A State''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) Pooling grants.--2 or more localities receiving grants under this part may elect to pool all or a portion of those grants to contract with an accredited nonprofit organization (as defined in section 2(b) of the Training Rural Law Enforcement Officers Act of 2026) for the purpose of providing training to the group of localities that have pooled such grants.''. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in