civics.gg/S. 5282
S. 5282·FederalIn CommitteeEconomy

Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act

Sponsored by Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM] (D-NM)Introduced August 6, 2026Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 5282 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 5282

To withdraw certain Federal land in the Rio Chama Watershed area of the State of New Mexico from mineral entry, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

August 6, 2026

Mr. Lujan (for himself and Mr. Heinrich) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To withdraw certain Federal land in the Rio Chama Watershed area of the State of New Mexico from mineral entry, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAND IN RIO CHAMA WATERSHED AREA, NEW MEXICO.

(a) Withdrawal.--The Federal land located within the boundary area depicted as ``Rio Chama Watershed'' on the map entitled ``Rio Chama Watershed Draft'' and dated April 22, 2026, is withdrawn from all forms of location, entry, and patent under the mining laws. (b) Effect on Non-Federal Mineral Interests.--The withdrawal described in subsection (a) applies only to minerals owned by the United States and nothing in this Act affects, diminishes, impairs, encumbers, or otherwise applies to any right, title, interest, or claim in minerals owned by, held in trust on behalf of, or claimed by-- (1) a qualified land grant-merced; or (2) an Indian Tribe. (c) Effect on Traditional and Customary Uses.--Nothing in this Act prohibits, restricts, or otherwise affects the traditional, customary, or personal use, gathering, or collection of common variety minerals, stone, sand, gravel, clay, adobe, mineral earths, or other similar materials by members of a qualified land grant-merced or acequia community, or by other individuals, for domestic, cultural, religious, ceremonial, subsistence, agricultural, or noncommercial construction purposes, consistent with applicable Federal law and the management of the National Forest System. (d) Definitions.--In this Act: (1) Indian tribe.--The term ``Indian Tribe'' means the governing body of any individually identified and federally recognized Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, community, affiliated Tribal group, or component reservation included on the most recent list published pursuant to section 104(a) of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 5131(a)). (2) Qualified land grant-merced.--The term ``qualified land grant-merced'' means a community land grant issued under the laws or customs of the Government of Spain or Mexico that-- (A) is recognized under New Mexico Statutes Chapter 49, Articles 1 and 4 (or a successor statute); and (B)(i) has a record of historical or traditional use on Federal land within the boundary area described in subsection (a); or (ii) has a patented exterior boundary that is or previously was located on or adjacent to Federal land within the boundary area described in subsection (a). <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in